387

Opinion

Economics Explained: The EU Recovery Funds and who will pay for it
Martina Facino

April 5th, 2021


This article is more than 3 years old.

No taxes on flags, fortunately (photo: Pixabay)

The COVID-19 pandemic and related lockdown measures have triggered an economic downturn. As businesses such as shops, restaurants and theatres were forced to close, and travel was forbidden, economies worldwide slowed down, with consequent bankruptcies and increased unemployment.

Billions up for grabs
To help European countries recovering from the economic downturn, the European Commission, the European Parliament and EU leaders have agreed to make 750 billion euros available to member states: the so-called EU recovery fund.

Around half of this amount will be available to member states in the form of grants (i.e money that is ‘donated’ to the states), while the rest can be provided in the form of loans (i.e money that the EU lends to the member states, which has to be paid back with interest).

In order to unlock their allocated share of the fund, member states will need to present national recovery plans (i.e show how they plan to employ the funds).

Where does it come from?
To finance the provision of the fund, the European Commission (on behalf of the EU) will issue bonds on financial markets – so quite similar to how a company would do it.

Because the EU is a union of countries and is therefore perceived as safe, it can borrow money at cheaper rates than (most) individual countries.

The Commission will then either lend the money to individual member states (at the same interest rate as the one it borrows at) or provide the money as grants.

Is it really for free?
Although the EU countries that use the grant money will have access to better financing rates, there is always a cost attached to the grant money.

Borrowing on the financial markets means that investors (i.e the buyers of the EU bonds) expect a return, which will be paid by the EU budgets in the coming years (by the end of 2058). 

So ultimately the debt will be paid by companies and citizens contributing to the EU budget through different channels (different types of taxes).

Green alignment
Additionally, the European Commission has added new taxes, including one on plastic waste. 

This has the objective of not only providing an additional source of funding, but also of nudging companies and consumers towards greener solutions in line with the EU’s objectives on environmental sustainability.

About

Martina Facino

Martina Facino works for a leading consultancy firm where she specialises in competition economics and maintains a strong interest in macroeconomics. Using her master’s in economics and finance, she intends to focus on explaining macroeconomic concepts and describing them in the current context.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”