112

News

Corona crazy: Restaurant lobby group regards reopening regulations as unrealistic

Ben Hamilton
March 30th, 2021


This article is more than 3 years old.

Diners will need 7.5 sqm of space each, according to the proposed rules, while the corona pass and eating whilst it’s raining is also a big turnoff among restaurateurs

We’re going to need a whole lot of blankets (photo: Nichlas Hummelsberger)

HORESTA, the interest organisation for the hotel and restaurant industry, has described the new reopening regulations as a joke.

From April 21, restaurants will be able to open for outdoor dining, and then from May 6 be able to serve indoors. 

However, on top of the requirement that diners must present a corona pass, there is an extra snag: indoors, the health authorities recommend that diners must have a minimum of 7.5 sqm each. 

According to HORESTA, this requirement needs to be reduced – hugely.

Cut the requirement by 70 percent!
HORESTA’s political director, Kirsten Munck, tells BT that the requirement needs to be cut to just 2 sqm before “it makes sense to open” – the same requirement that was needed to reopen during the summer of 2020, along with 4 sqm for standing guests.

“Preferably the area requirements should be completely removed,” she said. “We are pushing the government, so hopefully it will happen.”

Philip Lundsgaard, a restaurateur who runs bistros in Rungsted and Copenhagen, concurred.

“There are no restaurants that are going to open with those area requirements,” he told BT. “I would not be able to turn over what it costs to employ my staff. It is a physical impossibility. This is ruining the restaurant business; it’s a complete hole in the head.”

Hope for change, but what about the rain?
In an email sent to BT, the responsible Ministry of Business Affairs concedes there is room for leeway, so there is hope the regulations might be altered before the restaurants can reopen.

“It may be noted that the facts in connection with the reopening of the industry will be discussed in the sector partnership for restaurants and cafes prior to their reopening,” it stated.

However, restaurateurs claim the requirement is not the only problem. Firstly, diners will need a corona pass – a problem as the industry generally acknowledges that 60 percent of all such visits are spontaneous.

Secondly, outdoor dining in mid-April is hardly enticing. The average temperature is barely 8 degrees.

“And if it starts to rain – as it often does in Denmark – the guests are not allowed to go inside. No, much better to stay shut down,” added Lundsgaard.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”