361

News

A big Fanø: New index ranks Denmark’s nature

Christian Wenande
March 4th, 2021


This article is more than 3 years old.

Urban areas and land used for agriculture are among the principle detractors in new Aarhus University ranking 

Fanø is head and shoulders above the rest (photo: Visit Denmark/Niclas Jessen)

If you’ve ever wondered how much nature is in your municipality, you’re in luck.

In co-operation with conservation association Naturfredningsforening, researchers from Aarhus University have mapped and ranked all municipalities in Denmark in accordance to how much nature is available.

The Nature Capital Index revealed that the island of Fanø finished top of the pops with a score of 87, followed by another island, Læsø, which scored 81.

It’s all a steep downhill trajectory from there with Tårnby (75), Lyngby-Taarbæk (64), Furesø (57), Rudersdal (54), Halsnæs (53), Gribskov (48), Hillerød (47) and Helsingør (46) completing the top 10.

“The municipalities have a great deal of responsibility for Denmark’s biodiversity and thus require tools to improve it,” said Rasmus Ejrnæs, a senior AU researcher behind the index.

READ ALSO: Government lands historic nature agreement

Not bad for CPH
Other notables included Copenhagen being ranked 27th, Aalborg (33), Herning (37), Gentofte (45), Esbjerg (69), Aarhus (77) and Odense (87).

Three Copenhagen area municipalities finished at the bottom with Rødovre (7) finishing last behind Frederiksberg (8) and Glostrup (10).

The ranking is based on the percentage of land that is covered by urban areas, agriculture, forest, marsh, meadow, moor and lake.

“The less habitat for species, the lower the ranking is for the municipality,” Naturfredningsforening wrote.

“In short, the Nature Capital Index covers how many mapped and potential habitats for endangered species that each municipality contains. The higher the ranking, the more area a municipality has for animals and plants to live in.”

Check out how well your municipality fared.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”