116

News

Corona reopenings: Something’s clearly wrong if Dansk Folkeparti is the voice of reason

Ben Hamilton
February 23rd, 2021


This article is more than 3 years old.

While many political party leaders have remained silent, DF chair Kristian Thulesen Dahl was quick to outline a number of areas of concern in the task force’s recommendations

Kristian Thulesen Dahl was quick to point out some of the obvious drawbacks of the proposals (photo: News Øresund – Flickr)

On Wednesday the government is expected to announce a partial reopening from March 1, which the health minister, Magnus Heunicke, describes as a “gradual but noticeable reopening in the coming weeks”.

However, while educational establishments in the regions, large shops, outdoor cultural institutions and sports/association activities look set to benefit, educational establishments in urban areas and many regions, along with most medium and small-sized shops, will miss out.

Overall, for outdoor activities, the gathering limit will be raised from five to 20 people, and negative corona tests might be necessary to take part. The exact details remain unclear for now.

“We can’t go on like this”
The measures are based on the recommendations of the so-called Task Force, a group of experts assembled by the government to consider different reopening scenarios.

In the event of the government lifting restrictions (within reason), they predict the infection rate would rise and fill hospitals again, with numbers peaking at 870 in April before falling as more people get vaccinated and the weather gets considerably warmer. 

Dansk Folkeparti leader Kristian Thulesen Dahl, who takes issue with the undemocratic nature of the task force, yesterday said that uncomfortable infection numbers is something the country needs to live with.

“The price of not getting things started is getting too high,” he said. “Both financially and humanely.”

DF speaks up for efterskoles and small shops
Dahl takes particular issue with the reopening plans for educational establishments, which only include those in west Jutland, north Jutland and Bornholm.

In those three regions, graduating students will be able to return to their studies, provided they do not exceed 50 percent of the capacity (Jutland areas) or have a negative corona test (Bornholm).

Efterskoles in the three regions will likewise reopen, but nowhere else.

“Open them nationally. At an efterskole, you can easily make bubbles,” urged Dahl – a view that is also shared by Konservative leader Søren Pape Poulsen. 

The DF leader is also concerned about the arrangements for shops, as the chief concern would appear to lie with department stores, which may reopen providing their floor space does not exceed 5,000 sqm.  

“As I read it, it seems that the small shops do not have an explosive effect on the infection rate,” said Dahl. 

Bold on the right
Also on the right, Konservative was mostly satisfied with the suggestions of the task force and their focus on opening where the infection is low.

“We are also happy that it is the graduating students who are returning. As a starting point, it goes very hand-in-hand with what we have proposed. There are certainly good beats in it,” applauded health spokesperson Per Larsen.

However, he urged the government to remember that the key to any reopening is considering the strain it will place the healthcare system under, suggesting that more could be included.

“It is a level that does not threaten our healthcare system,” he said.

Cautious on the left
Meanwhile on the left, Enhedslisten spokesperson Mai Villadsen took an opposite view.

“I immediately thought that the number [of 870] was quite high, and it is approaching our maximum capacity,” she said.

“And then it would not take much before our healthcare system can no longer keep up. Therefore, for God’s sake, there mustn’t be any over-reaching policies.” 

Regarding the school reopenings, she was happy: “I do not think there can be any doubt about the consequences of the closures for our children and young people.”

It was left to Radikale leader Sofie Carsten Nielsen to bring up the business sector.

“I think too many businesses, liberal professions, high school students, post-secondary students and higher education students have paid an insanely high price this winter,” she said.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”