245

News

Former immigration minister could face impeachment trial 

Christian Wenande
December 15th, 2020


This article is more than 4 years old.

Commission found that Inger Støjberg was warned in 2016 that separating asylum couples involving a minor was illegal

Inger Støjberg is under considerable duress (photo: News Øresund

Inger Støjberg, the former immigration minister, could face an impeachment trial for actions in 2016 pertaining to asylum in Denmark. 

A commission assigned to look into the situation has released findings that are highly critical of Støjberg.

Among other things, the commission concluded that her order to separate couples seeking asylum, in which one of the couple was a minor, was illegal – and that she was made aware of that fact.

Afterwards, she was involved in misleading Parliament about the situation, the commission found.

READ ALSO: Former immigration minister blasted over Trumpist rhetoric

Extremely rare situation
Based on the commission findings, fellow Blue Bloc party Liberal Alliance – has called for an impeachment trial in the matter. 

This is a very dramatic turn of events as there have only been five such trials in Denmark since 1849

The most recent such trial took place in 1995 when former justice minister Erik Ninn-Hansen was impeached and sentenced to conditional imprisonment for his role in the Tamil Case.

Before that, the most recent impeachment trial in Denmark was back in 1910.

READ ALSO: More cake for Støjberg? Denmark passes 100th immigration law in just a few years

Red Bloc to wait 
Red Bloc parties have announced that they will wait for a legal assessment of the commission findings before deciding whether to vote in favour of an impeachment.

Government party Socialdemokratiet is reportedly assuming a deciding role in that process.

Despite the drama, Støjberg maintained that she does not intend to step down from her current position as the deputy head of Venstre party.

She is supported by her own party, Dansk Folkeparti and Nye Borgerlige, which all see no grounds for an impeachment trial.

Støjberg is perhaps best remembered for having a cake in celebration of passing the 50th law cracking down on immigration in Denmark.

More recently, she came under fire after calling for ministers to “drain the swamp”: a phrase now synonymous with the politics of Donald Trump.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”