247

News

Green tax reform deal reached

Luke Roberts
December 9th, 2020


This article is more than 4 years old.

Despite a strong majority, the agreement threatens to undermine the government’s support from Enhedslisten

Germany is reopening some of its coal-fired power plants in an effort to end dependence on Russian gas (photo: Tony Webster)

A wide coalition of parties came together in agreement surrounding a new tax reform supposed to ensure Denmark reaches its future emissions goals. The country has pledged to cut emissions by 70 percent by 2030.

As part of the deal, the business community will receive a total of 6 billion kroner between 2021 and 2025 to support their green transition.

No CO2 tax … yet 
The tax reform will be implemented across two phases, beginning with an increase in the energy tax of 6 kroner per gigajoule in 2023, with taxes differentiated according to fuel type.

Then in 2025, exempt industries – including agriculture and horticulture – will also become subject to the taxation.

A key part of the agreement is that no tax on CO2 emissions has been agreed. Instead, as a compromise between parties across the political spectrum, the agreement dictates that a group of experts will look into the possibilities of introducing a tax in the future.

The findings from the group are set be submitted at the end of 2021 and again in mid-2022. After that, the prospect of a CO2 tax will again be discussed.

Enhedslisten not impressed
One party that did not sign up to the agreement is Enhedslisten – one of the government’s support parties. The decision to omit any concrete promises of a CO2 tax was disappointing to the climatically-inclined party.

“I am deeply disappointed that the parties signed to the Climate Act have decided to put the CO2 tax in a jam-jar and postpone such an important climate decision – perhaps even until the next election period,” said Mai Villadsen, the climate spokesperson for Enhedslisten.

It is the first time in this parliamentary cycle that Enhedslisten has diverged from the government on a major green deal. With significant green deals still to come, TV2 analyst Hans Redder predicts that the disagreements within the ‘red bloc’ have only just begun.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”