198

News

Closure of Denmark’s oil fields comes at a price

Luke Roberts
December 7th, 2020


This article is more than 4 years old.

Efforts to adhere to the Climate Act come with a financial hit – but one worth taking

Denmark currently has 30 gas and oil fields in the North Sea (photo: pikist.com)

Last week, a political majority agreed that Denmark’s oil production must come to an end by 2050.

The phasing out of the country’s oil and gas comes at a cost, but it is a cost that leading politicians say the country must bear.

The Ministry of Finance estimates that in total 13 billion kroner in profits will be lost, while the climate minister, Dan Jørgensen, has described the decision as “historic” but “not free”.

No big deal
Whilst the figure does seem large, Lars Gårn Hansen, an environmental economics professor, suggests we are perhaps not looking at it from the right angle.

“Thirteen billion is a lot of money. I don’t know how many super-hospitals there are, but there are costs,” he acknowledged to TV2.

“But spread out over 30 years, is it an amount that means something huge or fundamental to the Treasury? No.”

This position is in line with previous reports from the Ministry of Taxation, which previously told Information that “the North Sea is no longer particularly important for our economic sustainability and longer-term positions”.

More pressing concerns
Rather, Denmark’s Climate Act dictates that the country must be climate-neutral by 2050 and with a 70 percent reduction in climate footprint by 2030. Achieving this has its own costs, but it seems clear that the phasing out of oil and gas is one of the cheaper ways of achieving this.

“Of course it would be cheaper not to [phase out oil and gas], but then we would not comply with the Climate Act, and we already have that,” Hansen explained.

Since Denmark started drilling for oil in 1972, the state has earned around 514 billion kroner, with further earnings over the next 30 years lying somewhere between 88 and 240 billion according to Energistyrelsen.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”