127

News

Minister defends PM: Mink farmers were not legally obligated to start the cull

Helen Jones
November 26th, 2020


This article is more than 4 years old.

Mette Frederiksen may not be yet off the hook as parties call for an investigation into the mink cull

Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen. Social Democrat policy shifted to the right to compete with Danske Folkeparti for working class voters (photo: News Oresund)

The justice minister Nick Hækkerup has defended the Prime Minister’s decision to call for a nation-wide mink cull, claiming that things that are said at government press meetings cannot be taken as ‘orders’.

Mogens Jensen has already been forced to resign following the revelation that the Danish government did not have the legal power to call for a mink cull, leading to a shake-up of Mette Frederiksen’s ministerial team.

The Prime Minister can’t be held responsible
Attention is now turning to whether or not the prime minister will also face consequences for the call which has cost mink farmers billions.

“It is not correct that the government gave an illegal order. No mink farmer was legally obligated as a result of that press meeting,” said Nick Hækkerup.

His comments, however, may prove to only add fuel to the fire in the ongoing debate. Jakob Ellemann-Jensen, leader for Venstre, said it was “news to me” that government speeches given at press meetings could not be taken as orders.

Prime Minister acknowledges her mistakes
Hækkerup’s defence also stands in sharp contrast to Mette Frederiksen’s own explanation.

“I have nothing to hide. The most important thing is to be able to stand by your failures and to work towards fixing them. The government has no problem with acknowledging that it has made a mistake, and I am extremely sorry for it,” she said.

Far from ridding itself of the troubles surrounding the mink scandal, the government appears to have raised more questions than answers, with parties now calling for an in-depth investigation into its handling of the cull. The only disagreement now is over which authority is best suited to lead it.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”