156

News

Major Danish newspapers open to printing Mohammed Cartoons

Christian Wenande
November 1st, 2020


This article is more than 4 years old.

Both Berlingske and Weekendavisen have signalled that they are willing to run an advert placed by Nye Borgerlige party

Freedom of speech on the line, contend advocates (photo: Pixabay)

Some 15 years ago, Denmark found itself in the midst of an international crisis  after Jyllands-Posten newspaper printed the Mohammed Cartoons in 2005.

Now, two major Danish newspapers, Berlingske and Weekendavisen, have announced they would be willing to reprint the contentious drawings.

The news comes on the heels of Nye Borgerlige head Pernille Vermund’s statement that her party intends to take out an advert to see the cartoons printed again in a show of support for Samuel Paty, the French school teacher who was recently murdered after he had shown them to his students.

First, Weekendavisen editor-in-chief Martin Krasnik revealed today during the P1 radio program ‘Ordet Fanger’ that his newspaper would not be averse to approving an ad from Vermund.

READ ALSO: Party wants to print Mohammed Cartoons in Danish newspapers

Buy some camembert 
A few hours later, Berlingske’s editor-in-chief Tom Jensen echoed the sentiment on social media.

“Similarly to Weekendavisen’s editor-in-chief, I can say that if we are sent Nye Borgerlige’s advert because they want it printed by us – and we can ascertain that it includes the content that I have been made aware of – then Berlingske will also print the ad,” Jensen wrote on Twitter.

Meanwhile, Jyllands Posten and Ekstra Bladet are among the newspapers that have decided against printing the advert as they fear for the safety of their employees.

Nye Borgerlige will contact the major newspapers in Denmark tomorrow to present them with the advert they wish to run.

A number of Danish politicians, mostly from Blue Bloc parties like Venstre and Dansk Folkeparti, have also posted images of the controversial drawings from 2005 on social media over the weekend. 

Others have called for Danes to buy some camembert or champagne to help counter the boycott of French products in countries like Turkey, Pakistan and Bangladesh.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”