127

News

A seventh of those hospitalised with the coronavirus admitted for other reasons

Ben Hamilton
October 28th, 2020


This article is more than 4 years old.

Nye Borgerlige rubbishes claims the healthcare system might be overloaded – the primary justification for the recent restrictions

Winning the battle in the capital (photo: Pixabay)

The number of people infected with COVID-19 who are currently in hospital is 137. On April 1, the number was 535. 

But not only is there a wide gulf between the figures, and the two death rates seven months apart, but apparently one in seven of the hospitalised patients were not admitted due to the coronavirus, according to figures from the five regions assessed by Statens Serum Institut (SSI).

For example, somebody could be admitted to hospital after a car accident and then found to have COVID-19.

Restriction reasons risible
According to Lars Boje Mathiesen, the health spokesperson for the new right-wing party Nye Borgerlige, this suggests the government has been too quick to introduce tighter restrictions, such as limiting public gatherings to just ten.

Mathiesen contends that the primary motive for the government’s action, which is ensuring the healthcare system isn’t overloaded with coronavirus patients, is not backed up by the figures.

“We are nowhere near a strained healthcare system, so therefore we should prioritise shielding weaker people. We must not implement restrictions that cannot be defended through facts,” contended Mathiesen on Facebook.

Still taking up resources
The SSI defends the inclusion of the extra 15 percent as they are still taking up resources. 

“They take up an isolation space that requires some extra resources,” Tyra Grove Krause, a SSI department head, told DR. “Besides, an elderly lady hospitalised with a broken leg may have broken the limb due to her COVID-19 infection.”

Maybe a better indicator is the number of patients infected with the coronavirus who are in intensive care. At present, there are 19. On April 2, the number was 153. 

 


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”