226

News

Copenhagen: Expensive for eating out … and eating in!

Ben Hamilton
October 27th, 2020


This article is more than 4 years old.

New survey names Danish capital as seventh worst in Europe for meat-lovers, but it’s more to do with the cost of energy than entrecôte

Depending on your reaction to this finest Uruguayan entrecôte, this is either good news or bad news (photo: Rachmaninoff)

The news just got worse for Copenhageners.

According to a recent index published by Housing Anywhere, the Danish capital is the second most expensive European city for restaurants.

But now it emerges it is also the dearest city for eating in as well! 

Highest cooking costs
Copenhageners pay the highest energy prices in relation to using their ovens, according to the 2020 Diet Destination Report compiled by money.co.uk

They pay €2,193.50 a year, which is roughly five times more than the cheapest cities included in the survey, such as Moscow.

The residents of Berlin, Munich and Brussels pay similar rates to Copenhageners.

Seventh worst for meat-lovers
However, the Danish capital is not the worst city for meat-lovers. That honour was taken by Oslo, with Copenhagen seventh. 

While meat-lovers in the capital face crippling energy prices and limited steakhouse takeaway options (fifth worst), the price of the raw products was not as high.

In Housing Anywhere’s figures, groceries only rated as the 30th priciest, and money.co.uk found that meat was relatively affordable compared to others, even though the prices are 13 percent higher than the European average. 

Nevertheless, for meat-lovers feeling a little deprived, here are the five best European cities to chew on: Glasgow, Budapest, London, Moscow and Paris.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”