150

News

Concrete not as harmful as previously thought – study

Luke Roberts
September 24th, 2020


This article is more than 4 years old.

Cracks appearing in the concrete CO2 narrative? (photo: Pixabay)

Previously feared to be one of the largest contributors of CO2, the cement industry may in fact have less of an environmental impact than previously thought. This is the message emerging from a new report from the University of Southern Denmark.

Of course not exactly environmentally friendly, the new findings do at least suggest that work to greenwash the industry might not need to be as extreme as expected.

‘Fungal effect’ 
According to Professor Gang Liu of the Department of Green Technology, “about 30 percent of the total CO2 emissions from cement production are taken up by concrete structure”.

It is known as the fungal effect – a slow process in which the lime in the cement reacts with CO2 in the air. Buildings and road structures such as bridges and tunnels are thought to absorb the most in this manner.

Professor Liu describes the cement industry as “double-edged, emitting CO2 in production on the one hand and then absorbing CO2 over time”.

Hope for the future 
By including this factor in their calculations, researchers believe that in “the most optimistic scenario” the cement industry could be carbon-neutral by 2090.

Recently, Aalborg Portland – Denmark’s biggest producer of cement and CO2 – developed a new type of cement that significantly reduces the CO2 emitted during production.

More, however, will need to be done to transform the industry as we move towards a greener future.

 


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”