281

News

Tense talks in EU summit on corona recovery budget

Gulden Timur
July 20th, 2020


This article is more than 4 years old.

Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen demands a “reasonable balance” between loans and grants in the EU summit on the coronavirus recovery fund in Brussels

High tensions and clashing interests characterise the EU summit on the coronavirus recovery fund (photo: Pixabay/fill)

EU leaders meeting in Brussels remain in deep disagreement over the new coronavirus recovery fund and the bloc’s next long-term budget. 

Since Friday morning, the summit of EU Heads of State and Government has been ongoing.

The recovery fund that aims to boost European economies after the pandemic has sparked debates throughout the meeting. 

‘Reasonable balance’
EU countries plan to jointly lend up to 5.6 billion kroner to the fund. The money is aimed at countries such as Italy, Spain and France, which have been hit hard by the Coronavirus Crisis. These countries want the subsidy share to be as high as possible. 

In the original proposal, two-thirds of the money, 3.722 billion kroner, was to be given as a subsidy while the rest was to be offered as loans to countries in need.

Yet the so-called Frugal Four consisting of Denmark, the Netherlands, Austria and Sweden are opposed to the money being given as grants. That is why Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen on Sunday demanded a “reasonable balance” between loans and grants.

On Monday morning, it was proposed that the subsidies be cut to 2.9 billion kroner. 

Interests opposed
Dutch Prime Minister Mark Rutte said on Monday morning that he feels that “progress is being made” but that there is still a risk that negotiations will break down. 

With his strict austerity approach, Rutte has frustrated other European leaders such as French President Emmanuel Macron and Italian Prime Minister Giuseppe Conte.

But Rutte said this was just “background noise”. “I fight for the Dutch and a strong Europe.” 

Luxembourg’s Prime Minister Xavier Bettel said that in his over seven years of work as head of government, he has not observed “interests as diametrically opposed as those we see now”.  

The tense meetings resume Monday afternoon. 


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”