136

Opinion

Green Spotlight: Fully embrace the green momentum
SIBYLLE DE VALENCE

February 7th, 2020


This article is more than 4 years old.

Apparently we have been carving it up too hard on Amager Bakke (Photo: Kallerna)

While I was standing on top of Amager Bakke, I felt like Copenhagen’s green transition was unfolding before me.

Paradigm parallel turns
An old paradigm involving the former incinerator being dismantled was vanishing in front of my eyes while a new paradigm was taking over with an array of windmills and the state-of-the-art waste-to-energy plant I was standing on.

In the old paradigm, I wanted to be as far away as possible from a plant burning trash: it’s dirty, it pollutes, it’s noisy and it’s smelly.

But in the world of clean technologies, it had suddenly become a destination, and I was skiing on top of two gigantic furnaces.

Green superpower
In the 1970s, when the oil crises hit Denmark very badly, the country was 99 percent dependent on foreign oil.

Measures to save energy were introduced such as car-free Sundays – at a time when the cycling infrastructure was close to non-existent. White crosses were painted on the roads where cyclists had been killed, and there were demonstrations.

The pragmatic and agile nation responded fast: and soon bikes had taken precedence over cars. This was the beginning of the Danish green transformation, and in 1991, Denmark built the world’s first off-shore wind farm.

t that time, it was far from being a lucrative business. Only a political vision could support such an expensive transformation, but those investments have turned out to be extremely healthy.

Green solutions lab
In 2020, sustainability measures around the world take inspiration from Scandinavia. And this is only the start, as Denmark has pledged to cut carbon emissions by 70 percent by 2030, become 100 percent independent of fossil fuels by 2050, and for Copenhagen to be carbon-neutral by 2025.

The targets are extremely ambitious. “We no longer have low-hanging fruits to pick as we picked them 30 years ago,” contends Dan Jørgensen, the minister for climate, energy and utilities.

We therefore need to change the way we produce, consume and transport ourselves. Basically, the way we live.

Doesn’t need to be hard
Fight for and not against a nicer environment, a more liveable city and a better life. All studies show that nature makes us happier.

The CopenHill roof park, for example, is expected to spread its biodiversity by pollinating the once grimy industrial area. It’s a power plant that is also a park. This is an illustration of what Bjarke Ingels, the Danish architect behind its design, calls hedonistic sustainability: “Sustainability that improves the quality of life and human enjoyment”.

We are all contributing to climate change in our daily lives. When we shop, unsustainable goods are still cheaper than sustainable counterparts. But cheap is expensive and tasteless.

Initiatives like GrimBox give hope for a new paradigm, making “food boxes with ugly-by-nature and surplus organic fruit and veg that don’t fit retail beauty standards”.

Create the future
How are we going to reach the ambitious target? Well, each one of us has a role to play to create the kind of future we want. Creativity starts with a great ‘what if?’.

And here’s an easy one to begin with: what if business people had annual quotas on air travel? Would videoconferencing suffice? Or sending a full-sized hologram, like French politician Jean-Luc Melenchon, who appeared at seven different locations at the same time during his 2017 presidential campaign?
It was a reminder that we all need to change our behaviour – even politicians.

About

SIBYLLE DE VALENCE

Sibylle is a French journalist, columnist and author who writes for a variety of French, English and Italian language-publications, specialising on the green transition. Having lived and worked in San Francisco, Milan, Berlin, Rome, Calgary and Paris, she speaks five languages. Follow her on Instagram at sibdevalence


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”