62

News

Parliamentary majority wants to punish mental cruelty more severely

Stephen Gadd
March 26th, 2019


This article is more than 5 years old.

People who subject others to degrading or abusive behaviour should be punished as much as if they had committed a physical assault

Bombarding someone with offensive texts will be punished if Parliament approves the new bill (graphic: US Air Force/Naoko Shimoji)

If passed, a new law would make it possible for people who subject others to psychological harassment of any kind to be given a prison sentence.

A majority in Parliament comprising the government, Dansk Folkepari and Socialdemokratiet all back the new measure put forward by the justice minister, Søren Pape Poulsen.

“It is essential we equate physical and mental cruelty. We’ve seen people living in terrible relationships in which mental cruelty has been the dominant factor and we’re going to do something about it,” Poulsen told TV2 Nyheder.

A new clause needed
In concrete terms, the law would make it possible for anyone who subjects another person attached to the household to deeply degrading, abusive or offensive acts to be sent to prison for up to three years. This might apply to a spouse, cohabitee, parent, foster parent or sibling.

The government would like to see a special clause in the criminal law statutes covering this type of thing.

Proving it could be hard
However, the association of judges, Dommerforeningen, is sounding a warning note: such a clause could be very difficult to substantiate evidence-wise.

Poulsen admits that this could be a challenge.

“It’s obviously easier to show bruises than it is psychological scars,” he said.

“But new technology opens up the possibility that the evidence could be in the form of a series of text messages of a threatening and controlling character.”


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”