379

Things to do

On Screens: Vampires who suck blood, balls and ideas

Ben Hamilton
March 14th, 2019


This article is more than 5 years old.

We thought this undead lark was original, but ‘After Life’ beat us to it”

In 2012, when Xinxin Ren Gudbjörnsson, a Chinese expat living in Denmark, told experts about her idea to spend just 600 kroner on producing a sitcom about vampires sharing a house, the reaction wasn’t good – and it wasn’t just because everyone was sick of shows about blood-sucking layabouts who were born in 1672 and had never thought to use their 99 percent immortality to help humanity in the slightest possible way. Or because it generally sucked both blood and balls.

READ MORE: Mission Impossible: How to make a TV show for the cost of a Tom Cruise poster

“Can’t be done,” they said. She promptly spent her budget on a website and two pairs of fake vampire teeth. The rest, like the show after one season, was history.
Those experts probably choked on their garlic bread two years later when the same concept made it onto the big screen on the other side of the world as What we do in the shadows, this time as a mockumentary with Jemaine Clement from Flight of the Conchords on board.

Given how hackneyed mockumentaries and vampires had become, it was the most unoriginal idea ever, so it’s unlikely they nicked it. Nevertheless, Gudbjörnsson did tempt fate by saying she hoped they would get a global audience. She was right about one thing. “People are pretty busy and shouldn’t have to adapt their schedules to fit TV in,” she told CPH POST in 2012. “Online channels are the future.”

Dumbo’s priceless ivory
With 81 on Metacritic, the TV adaptation of What we do in the shadows (from March 28 on HBO Nordic) has scored five points more than the original, but try setting that target for the makers of the live-action version of Dumbo (Not Released Worldwide; March 28) – the Disney original scored a jaw-dropping 96.
Reuniting Michael Keaton and Danny DeVito for the first time since … ah, should we really be encouraging this schmaltz at the expense of original films queuing up to be made? What are live action versions of The Jungle Book really bringing to the table, other than merchandising possibilities small African countries can only dream of? Resurrecting ‘Big Ears’ is the ultimate elephants’ graveyard.

Talking of cashcows, horror is back in favour, as audiences tend to want their thrills restricted to 90 minutes, not spread over nine seasons, and we’ve got two coming our way this fortnight. From Jordan Peele, the director of Get Out, comes Us (82 on Metacritic; March 21), a film in which a family are terrorised by an all-too familiar foe: themselves!

While Cutterhead (NRW; March 21) is set deep in the bowels of the ongoing Copenhagen Metro construction, and most of the dialogue appears to be in English, albeit it with a strong Polish accent. Claustrophobia alert – it might put you off enclosed spaces for life (and in death).

Hail the modern queens
Will Mary Queen of Scots (60; March 14) spell the end for period dramas when it fails because it’s aimed at people who hate them. It treads familiar steps with anachronistic dialogue, costumes and pro-diversity casting decisions. Debutant director Josie Rourke was adamant that “she would not direct an all-white period drama” – which is ballsy talk when you’ve never made a feature film before. The result is “history porn for the Instagram generation”, according to the Telegraph, although it has got lots of best costume, make-up and hairdressing nominations.

Don’t tell Rourke, but they’ve made a film about a band in the 1980s and not found room for a black or Asian actor in one of the leads! And to make it worse, they’ve chosen a couple of Brits: Douglas Booth (that smooth bastard in The Riot Club) and Iwan Rheon (that total bastard in Game of Thrones) to play two of Mötley Crüe’s founder members in The Dirt (NRW; Netflix from March 22).

The Brit invasion continues with Charlie Hunnam – he can’t do London accents, but he’s okay in LA – who is teaming up with Ben Affleck, Oscar Isaac and Pedro Pascal (Narcos) for Triple Frontier (62; Netflix on March 13) a thinking man’s answer to The Expendables.

And finally The Highwaymen (50; Netflix on March 29) is a welcome spin on the Bonnie and Clyde story that tells it from the perspective of the Texas Rangers (Kevin Costner and Woody Harrelsen) who killed them.

Creepier than Carrie’s mom
Returning to TV land, the pick of the fortnight has to be The Act (March 21 on HBO Nordic series), a limited series depicting the harrowing case of Gypsy Blanchard, a teenager whose mother had Munchausen syndrome – the rare condition in which a carer claims her patient has non-existent diseases. Playing her mother, Patricia Arquette (on a roll after Escape at Dannemora) is reminiscent of Piper Laurie in the original Carrie – and we know what happened to her! Who said horror couldn’t work over a long prolonged period …

Elsewhere on HBO Nordic, we’ve got new seasons of AP Bio (S2, March 8), No Offence (S3, March 13), The Good Fight (S3, March 14), Billions (S4, March 18), Pretty Little Liars (spin-off, March 21), Knightfall (S2, March 26) and Gomorrah (S4, March 30).

Netflix is no different with hundreds of them returning: Arrested Development (S5B, March 15), Queer Eye (S3, March 15), Santa Clara Diet (S3, March 29) and Luther (S5, March 31).

The latter means it is a busy moth for Idris Elba, who is fronting the silly looking Turn up Charlie (March 15 on Netflix), in which he plays an accidental male nanny who want to be a DJ.

If his talents are being wasted, Ricky Gervais will know how he feels, although he only has himself to blame, as he writes and directs After Life (57; on Netflix since March 8), a show mostly bereft of both situation and comedy, which is mostly dead on arrival.

He was the king of the mockumentary long before anyone thought of doing it with vampires, but the longer his barren patch continues, the more we suspect he was a mere leech on Stephen Merchant’s extremely long neck.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”