113

News

Grassroots climate proposal thrown out by government

Stephen Gadd
February 28th, 2019


This article is more than 5 years old.

Once again a citizens’ petition to the Danish Parliament has been rejected by a majority of MPs

Ice is melting fast in Greenland; some animals are adapting, but the danger remains (photo: Myriams-Photos/pixabay)

A cynic might be forgiven for wondering whether citizen petitions are anything more than pure political window dressing: so far, nearly all of them have been rejected by Parliament.

Yesterday the petition started on January 16 demanding new and tougher measures to fight climate change, which was signed in record time by 65,000 Danes, also received the coup de grace, reports Politiken.

READ ALSO: Widespread backing ensures citizens’ proposal on climate must be debated

Among other things, the petitioners proposed a six-point plan to ensure that Denmark increases its contribution to attaining the goals set out in the Paris Agreement. It also included five-year milestones set out for at least 15 years, as well as climate considerations being integrated into other areas of policy.

A broader hearing needed
Damning the petitioners with faint praise, Prime Minister Lars Løkke Rasmussen thanked them for their many good ideas, but said he would not be pushed into action before a broader hearing had taken place – and that would probably only be after Parliament’s summer holiday.

Rasmussen also argued that although 65,000 people had signed the petition together with 11 NGOs representing 250,000 people, “there are after all 5.5 million other Danes out there and I also want to engage in a dialogue with them”.

Toeing the PM’s line, the climate and energy minister, Lars Christian Lilleholt, “would not rule out” the idea of five-year milestones but would not agree at this point to be bound by individual elements of the petition.

More than just hot air
A number of opposition parties backed the petition’s demand that the government’s climate watchdog Klimarådet ought to have its independence secured and that climate considerations should be integrated into all new legislative proposals, as well as the five-year milestones.

Troels Dam Christensen, the secretariat head of the NGO grouping 92-Gruppen, was not happy.

“We are of course really happy that both the opposition and the government can see that there is a need for a new climate law, but we don’t think it’s a good idea to wait until after an election. Action needs to be taken now,” he said.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”