79

News

New food marking initiative to reduce food waste

Stephen Gadd
February 26th, 2019


This article is more than 5 years old.

Many consumers find the current date marking system on food confusing and throw food out unnecessarily

Slavishly following the date markings is more critical for some foodstuffs than others (photo: Nillerdk)

Do you know the precise difference between ‘keeps until’ (mindst holdbar til), ‘best before’ (bedst før) or ‘use by’ (sidste anvendelsesdato) when it comes to labels on food?

If not, you are in good company, according to a report presented recently to the European Parliament.

The report revealed that over half the people polled didn’t know the difference between ‘best before’ and ‘use by’, and it was also estimated that around 10 percent of all food waste in Europe is due to confusion about the date markings.

Not past it after all
As a consequence, a number of Danish producers such as Arla, Carlsberg, Løgismose Meyers, Thise and Toms have decided to try adding the words ‘often still good after’ (ofte god efter) to products with the words ‘keeps until’, reports DR Nyheder.

READ ALSO: Danish government to set up food waste think-tank

The food app Too Good To Go is behind the initiative and it is designed to make it clear to people that just because a food product has gone past the printed date, it need not necessarily be thrown out.

It’s common sense really
The Fødevarestyrelsen food authority also points out that ‘best before’ is actually a guideline that has more to do with the fact that the quality of the foodstuff is judged by the manufacturer not to be as good after that date, but it is still safe to eat. It is then up to the consumer to decide whether the product can be consumed or not.

“In the new formulation ‘often still good after’ there is still an element of consumer discretion and it is up to the consumer to use common sense,” said Mette Lykke, the administrative director of Too Good To Go.

Last year Norway introduced a similar system, and the experience so far seems to be positive, although it has not been going long enough for comprehensive studies to have been made.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”