217

Things to do

Performance Review: New play worthy of ‘Black Mirror’ and world domination

Ben Hamilton
February 17th, 2019


This article is more than 5 years old.

★★★★★★

The bohemian, the buff, the ball-breaker and the bully (photo: Aleksandar S. Mastilo)

In the likely event you ‘mai read’ only one sentence of this review, it will probably be the first, so let’s cut to the chase: ‘Mairead’ was the best English-language theatre production I’ve seen in Copenhagen – and I’ve seen a fair few.

Like ‘Black Mirror’ at its best
I’ve always been a firm believer that theatre groups should be producing more original work – and in Copenhagen-based Serbian playwright Tanja Mastilo, Why Not Theatre Company has discovered a gem.

Her third play for the group, ‘Mairead’, made its worldwide debut at Teatret Ved Sorte Hest on Friday, and if there’s any justice in this shallow, clickbait-seeking, nepotistic world we live in, it will soon be performed to audiences in Chicago, New York, London and Edinburgh.

But until then, we’ve got it all to ourselves – and I urge you to go, as it is as brilliantly perplexing as any episode of ‘Black Mirror’.

Visually stunning
One day, Mastilo will confirm what came first: the intriguing and topical story-line, or the simple but unbelievably effective set.

I am warming to the idea that she had a vision of four actors sharing the stage in an original fashion, and that the plot followed later, but given the background of director Nina Larissa Bassett, she probably played a large role in getting it just right. And it is perfect.

True, there are nods to ‘Saw’ and Samuel Beckett’s ‘Endgame’, and once the story-line develops, undoubted parallels to Agatha Christie’s ‘And then there were None’, but this is an original premise that will keep you gripped to your seat as it unravels.

Intriguing set-up
To a backdrop of ominous growling in a setting resembling the bowels of the Matrix, a superb ensemble cast splutter into speech to breathe life into Mastilo’s expertly-drawn, wholly believable characters.

Two men and two women awake from their sleep to make sense of their situation: where are they, who else is here and why are they being held?

Initially the rigid four-cell structure suggests there will be no physical interaction, but the second-act staging ingeniously enables the characters to dig into their back-stories and each others’ backs to illuminate their predicament.

Ace in the pack
Why Not Theatre pulled an ace out of the pack when it cast Kerry Norton-Griffith in the lead role – just last week Mastilo confessed to CPH POST that the London-based actress understands the role better than she does.

READ MORE: Performance Preview: Characters who speak from the heart

She is charismatic and captivating in what is a challenging role – the aforementioned flashbacks charting a decade of her life would make most method actors run a mile, but she knocks them out of the park.

Nathan Meister (the bully), Kevin Kiernan-Molloy (the buff) and Sue Hansen Styles (the bohemian) all lend strong support, but critiquing their performances would necessitate too much plot revealment, and this is a play you want to see with limited knowledge of its story-line.

Take a seat and ‘wake up’ with no knowledge of the situation – just like the actors. Don’t, I implore you, read any of the Danish reviews out there, unless you want the whole plot recounted.

Destined to be a classic
But it won’t spoil your fun to learn this is a play about love and relationships in the modern world that we can all relate to and enjoy.

Personally, I would have resisted mentioning the likes of Tinder and Facebook and kept the social media references generic – in a few years time, it might sound dated.

Because while it’s only had two performances, I don’t think it’s too premature to envisage this play being performed for decades to come.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”