257

News

Police suggest alternatives to armed guards outside Jewish institutions

Ben Hamilton
February 1st, 2019


This article is more than 5 years old.

Nearly four years since the Copenhagen attacks, the sentries still remain in place at great cost to the tax-payer

The army has been helping out since 2017, but the police hours are still mounting up (photo: Forsvaret)

A million hours or, if you like, the working lives of ten people – that is how much time the police have spent on guarding Jewish institutions in the capital region since the synagogue on Krystalgade was attacked just under four years ago.

Citing Rigspolitiet figures, BT claims the total has reached 1,022,057 hours, and some police officials think the time has come to consider other precautionary measures that don’t require as much man-power.

The figures are particularly surprising given that Danish Defence has been helping to protect the Jewish institutions since 2017 to alleviate the pressure on the police.

READ MORE: Copenhagen remembers terror attacks

Would better barriers work?
Torben Ryttergaard, a senior officer at Politigården, told the tabloid that it’s a waste of resources – particularly as experienced personnel are required to fulfil the duty – but that the police’s hands are tied by the politicians.

“One could, for example, set up physical barriers or initiate stronger monitoring,” he suggested.

Michael Hagemann Møller, the chair of Københavns Politiforening, agrees.

“Bombproof glass, high fences and more video surveillance could be mounted,” he suggested. “And street like Krystalgade could be completely blocked off – which would eliminate the possibility of bombers.”

READ MORE: New information indicates 2015 Copenhagen terrorist attacks were pre-planned

Trust in the government
Socialdemokratiet spokesperson Trine Bramsen, strangely perhaps for an opposition MP, appeared to call for greater trust in the political decision-making.

“If there was no real threat, then they wouldn’t use so many resources,” she said. “You have to trust that the decision has been made for professional reasons.”

A BT report in early 2016 claimed that 100 million kroner was spent on guarding the Jewish institutions over the first year, so it’s a fair assumption that the police alone have spent around a quarter of a billion.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”