124

News

Retail opening hours patronising to shopkeepers, contends Liberal Alliance

Ben Hamilton
January 14th, 2019


This article is more than 5 years old.

Retailers should be free to open whenever they choose, argues government party

The 2012 laws enabled Danes to shop more at night, but LA want to extend this to all holidays (photo: Kristoffer Trolle/Flickr)

Government party Liberal Alliance has described Denmark’s current retail opening hours law as “patronising” to shop owners.

Not long ago, only selected shops could open on a Sunday, but now the only days on which large establishments cannot open are public holidays – for example, all of the country’s shops are obliged to close at 15:00 on New Year’s Eve.

But the government would like to do away with these restrictions, arguing that in the interest of free enterprise it should be the shops that decide when they can open.

Autonomy for the traders
Socialdemokratiet and Dansk Folkeparti disagree, however, and without their support, the government won’t be able to form a majority to amend the law.

“The opening hours law is a patronising, strange law. It could be a little shop located in the countryside, and yet it is us at Christiansborg who decide when it can open. It should be the trader who decides,” Christina Egelund, political policy spokesperson for Liberal Alliance, told TV2.

“I want to live in a liberated country where traders and citizens are allowed to decide as much as possible themselves and we decide less.”

Giving physical shops an edge
The government argues physical stores need an edge to compete with online shopping.

And it also contends that liberated laws will also benefit tourists – particularly those visiting Denmark for a long weekend in May or June, only to discover that most shops are closed on a Friday (Great Prayer Day) or Monday (Whitsun).

Nevertheless, small supermarkets with an annual turnover of 33.2 million kroner are permitted to open on holidays.

Concerns for employees
Counter-arguments tend to take the side of employees, who parties like S and DF fear will be forced to work during national holidays held sacred by the nation, such as Christmas Eve.

DF business spokesperson Hans Christian Skibby warned a law change would have “quite serious consequences for small and medium-sized enterprises and those that have relatively few employees”.

The last time the law was changed was in 2012. Prior to the change, which enabled some stores to introduce 24/7 opening hours outside the holidays, the small supermarkets were the only ones able to open on a Sunday.

 

 


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”