28

News

Airborne blood-suckers a potential risk to Danish exports

Stephen Gadd
January 7th, 2019


This article is more than 5 years old.

Fences may not be enough to keep pig infection out of Denmark

The stable fly – small but potentially costly to pig farmers (photo: Pavel Krok/Fir0002)

The old adage ‘pigs might fly’ indicates an improbable event.

Scientists from the Technical University of Denmark (DTU) have just discovered an improbable event of their own from the real world involving porcine protagonists: blood-sucking stable flies are capable of infecting pigs with the dreaded African swine fever.

At the agricultural research centre on the island of Lindholm (soon to become a prison for criminal foreigners and rejected asylum-seekers), researchers from DTU’s veterinary institute have been able to feed pigs with flies infected with the disease, reports DR Nyheder.

Blood thicker than water
“This shows that blood-sucking insects such as stable flies are able to infect a new host – not by biting the host, merely by being eaten,” said senior researcher René Bødker.

“If a fly that has sucked blood from an infected wild boar enters a piggery and is then eaten by a pig, then the pig can contract African swine fever,” he added.

This rather renders the 70-km long fence being built across Denmark at a cost of 30 million kroner redundant.

READ ALSO: Huge border fence to keep out swine fever

The reason given for erecting the fence is to keep wild boar from crossing the border from Germany into Denmark and thus potentially infecting Danish pig populations.

An expensive business
Danish agriculture has estimated that it could cost up to 11 billion kroner in lost exports should the disease take hold.

On the other hand, Bødker does not expect flies to be the culprit if the infection does spread across the border. Firstly the flies are only infectious for 6-12 hours, and secondly they do not fly over great distances, he points out.

There might however be a problem if there is a herd of wild boar very close to a piggery. In such cases the only way to eliminate the risk is to make the piggery fly-proof, and that would be a very expensive proposition.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”