41

News

Neighbours to Lindholm ‘prison island’ vehemently opposed to plan

Stephen Gadd
December 14th, 2018


This article is more than 6 years old.

The controversial proposal to turn an isolated island into a prison are not popular locally

Better keep a lookout for Steve McQueen and Dustin Hoffman if Denmark’s own prison island becomes a reality (photo: Erik Christensen)

As well as attracting criticism on moral and ethical grounds, the neighbours to Denmark’s answer to Devil’s Island are not happy about the plans to use it as a prison for convicted foreigners waiting to be deported and rejected asylum-seekers either.

At a meeting for local residents and politicians attended by more than 200 people yesterday, it was agreed that nobody was in favour of the proposed change-of-use plans for the 17-acre island of Lindholm.

READ ALSO: Island for foreign ‘undesirables’ grabs international headlines

The island is currently being used by the DTU Veterinary Institute as a quarantined area to test against viruses that affect cattle and pigs.

Criminals at the bottom of the garden
Building the island prison was one of the concessions the government made to Dansk Folkeparti in order to get their agreement on the budget for next year.

“It’s a completely crazy idea,” said local Socialdemokratiet politician Brian Bressendorff to DR Nyheder.

A number of those attending the meeting were also concerned for their own safety when the new inmates moved in.

“I don’t want criminals in my back garden. My children have asked us to move because they daren’t have us living here,” said Hanne Petersen from Kalvehave.

Hit them at the ballot box
She went on to say that the politicians responsible deserved to be punished at the next election – a sentiment that was echoed by other participants in the meeting.

Michael Seiding Larsen, the deputy mayor of Vordingborg, who is a member of Venstre, expressed his dissatisfaction with the way his party had been forced to make this concession to DF.

However, he added that “I’m fighting the good fight here and actually don’t really care much what the party bigwigs think. This is our fight and our municipality, so I’m going to fight and not give up,” he said.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”