523

News

Latest edition of contentious ’Ghetto List’ includes 29 areas

Christian Wenande
December 3rd, 2018


This article is more than 6 years old.

15 housing areas characterised as being particularly hardcore

Government cracking down the whip on vulnerable areas (photo: Områdesekretariat Helsingør)

The government’s annual ‘Ghetto List’ was released on Saturday, revealing that 29 housing areas fulfilled the new more expansive criteria that came into effect earlier this year.

The contentious list includes 15 areas that are deemed to be particularly hardcore – while an additional 43 were deemed to be vulnerable, but outside the scope of being designated as a ghetto.

“The new ghetto criteria highlight the housing areas that have problems and are in need of help. The political agreement that tackles parallel societies gives municipalities and housing associations a number of new tools to effectively challenge ghettos and preventatively address the issue,” said the transport and housing minister, Ole Birk Olesen.

READ MORE: Danish municipality splitting up housing area to get it on ’Ghetto List’

Eight new areas
The new criteria means that there are eight new housing areas on the list compared to last year: Lundtoftegade, Aldersrogade and Hørgården in Copenhagen, Charlotteager in Høje Taastrup, Nøjsomhed/Sydvej in Helsingør, Korsløkkeparken Øst in Odense, Resedavej in Silkeborg and Ellekonebakken in Viborg.

Hardcore ghetto areas are housing areas that have been on the Ghetto List for at least five years, and as of 1 July 2019 they must have prepared a development plan that conveys how they intend to reduce the share of public housing in the area to, at the most, 40 percent.

That can be done by building new housing such as ownership, rental or housing co-operative apartments, by adding municipal jobs or by selling off or tearing down existing buildings.

New hard-core criteria
As per the new criteria, a ‘ghetto’ is defined as a housing area with at least 1,000 residents where the majority consists of immigrants and descendants of non-western countries, which fulfils two of the following four criteria:

– The share of residents aged 18-64 who are unemployed or not taking an education exceeds 40 percent over the past two years.

– The share of residents who have been convicted of a crime, breaching the law on weapons or narcotics is at least three times the national average over the past two years.

– The share of residents aged 30-59 who only have a basic education exceeds 60 percent.

– The average gross income of taxable residents aged 15-64 (excluding those in an education) is less than 55 percent over the same group in the region.

The areas that fulfil the criteria gain access to new tools designated to help them improve their standing.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”