103

News

Government wants more control of foreign infrastructure ownership

Stephen Gadd
November 19th, 2018


This article is more than 6 years old.

The government is contemplating a law to prevent vital Danish interests falling into foreign hands

Certain types of infrastructure are considered too important for national security to be foreign-owned (photo: flickr/Guillaume Baviere)

A number of countries have experienced capital funds owned by foreign states wanting to buy into their airports, harbours, mobile networks or utility companies.

There’s nothing necessarily wrong in that, you may say. But what if the fund is owned by a country that then uses its purchase as leverage to influence domestic policy?

This is precisely the dilemma that Denmark risks finding itself in. China in particular has been very active in this regard, having bought into enterprises in a number of countries in Europe such as Greece, Italy, Spain, the Netherlands and Belgium, reports Politiken.

No to blackmail
According to Bloomberg, China has bought into companies to the value of 2 trillion kroner over the last 10 years.

The finance minister, Kristian Jensen, feels Denmark needs a legal instrument to prevent such purchases if the government feels the infrastructure is critical to the nation.

“The fear is that there could be parties who buy up Danish infrastructure in order to put pressure on Denmark. They could either pressure us so that we can’t hold certain opinions, or try to force us into acting in a specific way or doing something else we would never have chosen to do,” said Jensen.

Yes to approved investment
Other countries such as Norway, Finland, Germany and the UK have already passed laws that require the screening of foreign investors before such transactions take place to avoid potential future headaches.

READ ALSO: Oil for ice water? Greenland, China lining up co-operation

The defence minister, Claus Hjort Frederiksen, points out the new law would not be a general rejection of Chinese investment or co-operative projects but it would put politicians in a better position in future to refuse investment in certain cases.

In Greenland, a state-owned Chinese entrepreneur firm was set to put in a bid for the new airport building scheme adopted last week by Greenland’s Parliament. In this particular case, Denmark reacted by offering a loan of 700 million kroner in order to keep the Chinese firm out.

A popular measure
A proposed new law would have the backing of a number of Danish parties and Enhedslisten would like to take it even further.

“We need a mechanism to prevent our infrastructure being owned by foreign companies that threaten our national security,” said the party’s finance spokesperson Pelle Dragsted.

“It [infrastructure] shouldn’t be owned by capital interests whose main function is to earn money rather than delivering an economical service, and consumers should also be guaranteed a say,” he added.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”