120

News

Focus intensifies on potential chemical pollution of drinking water

Stephen Gadd
October 25th, 2018


This article is more than 6 years old.

The national drinking water panel is working on an expanded list of chemicals to test for

There is an increasing realisation that water should be screened for potentially hazardous chemicals (photo: DanNav)

New information reveals that warnings about a potentially hazardous pesticide residue in drinking water have been ignored for over a decade.

The Miljøstyrelsen environmental authority has admitted to being warned about the chemical desphenyl chloridazon as far back as 2007, reports DR Nyheder.

READ ALSO: One in ten Danish drinking water sources are contaminated

The chemical, found in drinking water in many places in Denmark, results from the breakdown of the chloridazon spray used as a weedkiller under the name Pyrazon in the cultivation of beetroots, onions and turnips from 1964-1996. During this period, 1.2 million kilos were sprayed on Danish fields.

An unknown quantity
The problem is that nobody knows for sure whether this chemical is toxic or not. “Hopefully it’s not toxic. I say ‘hopefully’ because we just don’t know whether this substance can damage nerves, the immune system or disturb our hormonal balance,” said Professor Philippe Grandjean from the environmental medicine department of the University of Southern Denmark.

One of the reasons the chemical has not been detected earlier is that it has not been on the list of pesticides to look out for when analysing drinking water. At present, this comprises 35 pesticides, but that is far from enough, according to Grandjean.

“There are several hundred potential options but it was decided to look out for 30-35 at a time when it was thought these were the most important ones. But there we made a mistake because chloridazon has now been found,” he added.

Warnings overlooked
Back in 2007 the national research and advisory organisation GEUS sent a report to the environmental authority recommending that selected drinking water wells be tested for desphenyl chloridazon.

The following year the authority received further warnings from GEUS and also from the regions and municipality association Kommunernes Landsforening

It was only in the summer of 2017 that the environmental authority decided to test for the chemical as a routine.

At present, a working group under the auspices of the Drikkevandspanel drinking water panel is working on a new and expanded list of substances that should be tested for when drinking water is analysed.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”