128

News

Government’s much-vaunted coastal development projects all stranded

Stephen Gadd
October 23rd, 2018


This article is more than 6 years old.

After three years, none of the proposed building schemes round the coast have actually got off the drawing board

The beach at Løkken remains unspoilt by intrusive developments (photo: Tomasz Sienicki)

Back in October 2015, and with some fanfare, the government unveiled ten development projects aimed at attracting more tourists to the Danish coasts and generating growth and local jobs.

Among the proposed projects were water parks, resorts and a safari park.

In now transpires that none of the ten schemes have come to fruition, reports DR Nyheder.

Previously, the coastal zone rules prohibited building within 3 km of the shore without the approval of the Naturstyrelsen nature agency. The new projects all involved a special dispensation being granted from these rules.

Public opposition
Although Denmark has 7,300 km of coastline, there was a sharp public backlash and heavy criticism from the Danmarks Naturfredningsforening nature organisation.

READ ALSO: Nature organisation sees government growth plan as a further nail in the coffin for Denmark’s coastline

Two of the 10 projects are completely dead in the water whilst eight others are struggling to find funding or to obtain planning permission.

One of the places involved was Løkken on the northwest coast of Jutland, where there were plans to build a 34-room beach hotel with a restaurant plus wellness centre and conference facilities.

“Two investors were very interested to start with, but dropped out when it came to who should run the hotel. They say that it is too small,” said the mayor of Hjørring, Arne Boelt.

The mayor still believes in the project, but feels it will need an amendment to the local plan to allow more rooms to be built.

No business case
The head of the local tourist board is less optimistic. He is afraid the project won’t happen because the dispensation the government has given to allow building closer to the sea runs out in the autumn of 2020.

This comes as no surprise to Anne-Mette Hjalager, a professor of tourism at the University of Southern Denmark.

“Most of these projects just don’t have a ‘business case’. In other words, it is extremely uncertain whether they can pay,” she said.

“That means that investors are reluctant to commit money because they can also figure out that this is not viable.”

Another problem is local resistance to building near the coastline. A project near Svendborg generated 4,700 signatures against it and, as a consequence, in 2016 the municipality decided to withdraw 200,000 kroner’s worth of support.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”