956

Things to do

Performance Review: This fabulous Fagin deservedly defies his fate

Mark Walker
October 17th, 2018


This article is more than 6 years old.

★★★★★☆

The impression of a quality production is immediate with the opening number ‘Mad, pragtfulde mad’ (‘Food, glorious food’).

Albertslund Musikteater is large, but by no means a princely venue, so on first entering one begins to lower one’s expectations. As the curtain rises, however, the obvious ambition and technical prowess of the Rearview Teater company easily surpasses anyone’s lowered expectations.

Considering the limited resources, every penny is on show, from costumes to make-up, to an inventively manipulated set, which despite remaining essentially one structure throughout, nevertheless convinces us of several others by way of minimal redressing and innovative lighting transitions.

This miser is majestic
At times, one suspects that not all the performances are able to meet the standard of the production’s reach. Young Lauritz Kristiansen, while delivering well on his dramatic performance and cutting the figure of a fine Oliver, struggled to meet composer Lionel Bart’s vocal challenges.

At the other end of the scale stands Peter Secher Schmidt’s Fagin. It’s hard to imagine a better rendition of the character, as Schmidt nails every aspect of the wiley old miser, a hoarder of criminal loot who does little to improve the lives of the pick-pocketing urchins under his employ.

Also of note is Jacob Svensmark’s Bill Sykes who despite a solidly menacing portrayal of the character, including a compellingly insidious delivery of ‘Mit Navn’ (My Name), is perhaps a little too slight to fulfil the role’s more physical criteria.

Less downbeat than Dickens
Ultimately, it’s always a little discomforting to swallow Dickens’ neatly sour resolution to his story: that this embattled orphan from the streets is able to rise out of terrible poverty, not because of the considerable smarts or hutzpah he’s exhibited, but because he was, all along, a member of the upper middle class. How depressing.

It’s fortunate, then, that the last moral beat of Lionel Bart’s musical comes courtesy of Fagin, who is revealed here as the only character to be granted any real agency. Following the climatic events just prior, Fagin reviews his situation (‘Jeg overvejer situationen’) and opts to change his criminal ways in order to live a more honest life.

Given that Dickens chose instead to have the character hanged, we can only hope that Bart’s reformed Fagin manages to avoid that fate.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”