87

News

Could ‘hangover’ hormone be an aid to moderation?

Stephen Gadd
October 11th, 2018


This article is more than 6 years old.

New research has discovered a close link between an inhibitor hormone, eating too many sweet things and drinking too much

In an hour or so, their FGF-21 hormone will kick in (photo: Flickr/Jonathan Lin)

We all know the feeling when, during a heavy night on the booze, the autopilot suddenly kicks in and we feel a violent compulsion to call a taxi home.

The timing of the call may not be pure chance, as a new study has revealed that around two hours after a binging session starts, the liver begins to produce large amounts of a hormone called FGF-21.

One more for my baby …
Inevitably perhaps nicknamed the ‘hangover hormone’, it is released into the bloodstream and targets special receptors in the brain, telling the drinker that they’ve had enough, reports Videnskab.dk.

Susanne Søberg from the Trygfondens centre for active health at Copenhagen’s Rigshospital is the prime mover on the study.

Søberg’s team found that two hours after drinking an amount of alcohol typical to one bottle of wine, the level of FGF-21 increased dramatically and the effect continued until the next day, before subsequently tailing off to normal levels.

… and one more for the road
As well as telling us when we’ve had enough, the hormone may also protect us from potential liver damage.

Although there is no clear clinical evidence for the idea that FGF-21 encourages moderation, experiments with mice indicate that there is something in it.

The mice were found to have drunk 30-40 percent less alcohol after having an injection of FGF-21, and monkeys have also shown a lower preference for sugar when they have been given the hormone.

There seems to be a connection between having a sweet tooth and a predilection for alcohol. The results of a Danish study of 7,000 people in 2017 testing this phenomenon have been backed up by a British study of almost 500,000 people this year.

It’s in the genes
Both studies found that people with a specific gene variant reacted differently to FGF-21 and drank more alcohol as well as eating more sweet things.

The Danish study also showed that people who didn’t like sweet things generally have a higher level of FGF-21.

“This indicates that FGF-21 influences how much sugar we eat, as well as the fact that our craving for alcohol and sugar is connected,” said Søberg.

“We don’t have the final proof yet, but it is very likely that the hormone’s function is to prevent us eating too much and drinking too much,” said Matthew Gillum, another member of the research team.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”