135

News

Time to eradicate the billions of cigarette butts in Danish nature, urges cancer society

Ben Hamilton
September 20th, 2018


This article is more than 6 years old.

Dansk Erhverv rejects suggestion to tax filters, arguing more should be done to encourage consumers to change their behaviour.

They do their best to work their way into every nook and cranny of nature (photo: pxhere.com)

Last Saturday was World Cleanup Day as 13 million people in 155 countries gathered to collect as much rubbish from nature as possible, and Denmark was no exception.

Cleanup days aren’t new in Denmark, and every year International Coastal Cleanup assesses what is the biggest culprit in Denmark.

Will it, for example, be those pesky laughing gas cylinders that are turning up everywhere, or maybe the plastic film that covers a cigarette packet and is so often discarded onto the street?

No, although the winner was related to the latter. For the 32nd year, the cigarette butt emerged victorious.

And now various organisations have had enough.

Tax the filters!
Cancer society Kræftens Bekæmpelse would like to see the filters banned. An estimated 2-3 billion butts end up in Danish nature every year, it claims.

The butts are made of fibres containing a plastic called cellulose acetate, which takes a long time to break down naturally.

Kræftens Bekæmpelse argued to DR that the filters don’t really stop people getting cancer and other diseases – giving smokers a “false sense of security”.

One solution it suggests is a tax on the filter – a suggestion opposed by the Dansk Erhverv business interest group, which said more should be done to encourage consumers to change their behaviour.

More rubbish bins especially tailored to collecting butts would be a good start, it argued.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”