217

News

EU’s Copyright Directive: the end of a free internet or justice for artists?

Ross McPherson
September 18th, 2018


This article is more than 6 years old.

The European Parliament has been a source of contention in the past over concerns of its anti-democratic nature (picture: Flikr)

On September 12, the European Parliament voted in favour of a directive designed to ensure artists are remunerated fairly.

However, critics claim this could be the end of a free internet in Europe as the legislation could lead to censorship of speech.

There has been heated debate over the ‘Directive on Copyright in the Digital Single Market’, otherwise known as the ‘EU Copyright Directive’.

The policy specifics
The directive would implement two articles: 11 and 13.

Article 11, which to supporters is known as ‘the neighbouring tax’ and to those who oppose the bill ‘the link tax’, will force sites that link to or take information from others to contract a licence from the originator.

Article 13, known as ‘the upload filter’ to supporters and ‘the censorship machine’ to opposers, mandates that platforms must monitor the information being uploaded to stop copyright infringement.

The directive is being led my MEP and German European Peoples Party member Axel Voss. His mission is clear: ”We want to protect creatives.”

Supporting Danish creatives
A number of Danish musicians have supported the bill including Christopher, Medina, Mads Langer, Shaka Loveless and Morten Breum. Paul McCartney was also in favour.

The chief officer of Koda contended this will bring ”fair play in the digital world”.

The new legislation should help organisations like Koda, which look after the rights and royalties of Danish musicians, while making big tech-companies like Facebook, Twitter and Google responsible for the content uploaded to their websites.

Danish MEP Jens Rohde said ”I think it’s amazing that artists and journalists will finally have the same protections online as they do in real life.”

Who is responsible?
In the past, platforms like YouTube and Facebook have been considered open facilitators between creators and consumers.

However, under this new legislation they will be directly responsible for the content of their sites.

MEP Julia Reda tweeted ”If we allow automatic enforcement of #copyright, then say goodbye not just to memes, but also to the public domain. These algorithms are built on the assumption that all culture is privatised and eventually this will be true. Code is law.”


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”