103

News

Danish coastguard outlines the financial and human costs of empty drifting inflatables

Ben Hamilton
August 6th, 2018


This article is more than 6 years old.

Not only is every helicopter visit to a lilo expensive, it also endangers bathers seriously in need of help

It took the helicopter team a while to realise they were trying to save an inflatable full of seaweed (photo: LIBRESHOT)

Those inflatables aren’t cheap! It’s as if making them resemble animals have given the manufacturers licence to add an extra zero to the price.

So when little Lars turns up blubbing from his swim to announce that Søren the Swan has left for the big blue beyond, your first reaction is to curse the hole in your wallet that is quickly becoming a crater.

But that isn’t the only financial cost. According to the Eftersøgnings- og redningstjenesten rescue services, thousands of kroner are being lost in Danish waters due to unnecessary helicopter visits to empty drifting inflatables – as many as two a day.

The human cost
According to Klaus Thing Rasmussen, the head of Forsvarets Operationscenter – which oversees the deployment of rescue helicopters from Aalborg, Roskilde and Skrydstrup in south Jutland – the false alarms are eating into their resources, but the most worrying cost is the potential human one.

“It’s hard to put an exact price on a callout,” Rasmussen told DR.

“Ultimately, we are here to save people, so we don’t tend to think in those terms. The bigger blow is when there is someone in genuine need and the helicopter is elsewhere.”

More care needed
Rasmussen pleads with bathers to take extra care when using an inflatable – and to immediately report losing one to the nearest lifeguard.

“That way we can hopefully avoid sending our six-man crew to another false alarm,” he said.

No figures are yet available for this summer, but Rasmussen predicts a massive increase on the damp squib that was 2017.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”