94

News

New energy agreement opens up for giant wind turbines on land

Stephen Gadd
July 3rd, 2018


This article is more than 6 years old.

Last week’s energy deal adopted by a majority in the Danish Parliament may turn out to have a sting in the tail for some

More turbines will be moved off the land and into offshore wind farms by 2030, but the ones left could be much bigger than they are today (photo: Vestas Wind Systems)

Wind turbines and wind power are increasingly being seen as vital to the move away from ‘dirty’ energy towards attaining the CO2 reduction goals that Denmark has set for 2030.

One aspect of the new energy agreement, which was supported by a wide majority in Parliament last week, was a reduction in the number of turbines on land and more offshore wind farms.

However, the agreement does not include any guarantees against taller wind turbines on land, reports Politiken.

A blot on the landscape
At present, wind turbines often reach a height of 150 metres – as measured according to the highest extent of their blades.

The new agreement allows for turbines of up to 250 metres – only four metres lower than the pylons supporting Storebæltsbroen at its highest point – and this worries Dansk Folkeparti.

DF has fought hard for a total ban on new turbines on land because they feel that the turbines make a lot of noise and disfigure the landscape.

The new agreement sates there should be a maximum of 1,850 turbines on land by 2030, as opposed to the 4,000-odd at present. But there is no size limit included in the agreement, and that will be left up to municipalities to decide “according to current practice”.

Following where technology leads
A number of parties in Parliament have been agitating for larger turbines and Vestas already produces turbines with a height of 180 and 241 metres.

Mette Abildgaard, the political spokesperson for Konservative, says that it would be “perfectly natural” for Denmark to follow current developments towards taller turbines.

“We are open to giving the municipalities the possibility of allowing turbines taller than those we permit today,” she said, adding that they have local knowledge to site the turbines where they cause the least inconvenience.

“In future we will see fewer turbines but they will be larger, and we think that on the whole this is a positive development.”


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”