182

Opinion

Mind over Managing: My World Cup boycott lasted two minutes
Daniel K Reece

July 1st, 2018


This article is more than 6 years old.

Will Suarez have the last laugh again? (photo: Jimmy Baikovicius)

In 1939 Winston Churchill observed that Russia was “a riddle, wrapped in a mystery, inside an enigma”. Nearly 80 years later, with the 2018 World Cup in full swing, it is hard to imagine he would have changed his mind.

Repugnant Russia?
It’s easy to condemn a World Cup hosted by Russia as morally repugnant.

Firstly, there is the huge cloud that never disappeared after a bidding process in 2010 by an endemically corrupt FIFA, which was never fully investigated as the Russian computers involved in the bidding process were all “destroyed”.

Secondly, this is a country that has supported a tyrant using chemical weapons against its own people, been accused by the MH17 inquiry of killing 298 people by shooting down a commercial airliner over Ukraine, and seemingly orchestrated a double poisoning on the streets of England.

Regretful recollection
I therefore decided early on that I would boycott this World Cup. Sour grapes, you may say – the English in particular are still sore about the failure of their bid to host this very tournament.

What’s more, supporting England themselves is a particularly joyless experience, with only five knockout wins since 1966, primarily because they are bottom of the all-time World Cup penalty shootout rankings, thanks to a record of losing three out of three – so what would I be missing out on anyway?

Robbie likes a rouble
But as soon as the tournament kicked off, my resolve failed almost immediately. It’s hard not to be whipped up by the romanticism of the thing – the World Cup is something of a global religion in terms of bringing nationalities together.

Also, who knows what opportunities for peaceful protest may emerge (although Robbie Williams flipping the bird to an audience of billions in the opening ceremony was more Jesse Pinkman than Jesse Owens).

Russia to rue the day?
Of course, there’s also a huge difference between the Russian state and the Russian people, and it’s grossly unfair to judge the likely behaviour of the hosts by the actions of their head of state.

So, with my recently confirmed dual citizenship meaning I now officially have Denmark to support as well as England, I will be tuning in again along with everyone else.

And, from the perspective of an Englishman, what could be a more tantalising prospect than Vladimir witnessing the handover of the World Cup trophy to a smiling Harry Kane on July 15?

About

Daniel K Reece

Daniel is the managing director of Nordeq Management (nordeqmanagement.com), managing cross-border investment projects with a focus on international corporate and tax law issues. Educated as a lawyer, Daniel also teaches in the International Business and Global Economics department at DIS Copenhagen.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”