84

News

Tibet court case postponed in the wake of reopened enquiry

Stephen Gadd
June 20th, 2018


This article is more than 6 years old.

There’s been another twist in the saga of Danish police vs pro-Tibet demonstrators during Chinese official visits to Denmark

Who would have thought that a little bit of coloured cloth could cause so much trouble and cost so much public money? (photo: Peter Krefting)

The two middle-ranking officers of Copenhagen Police charged with perjury have had their day in court postponed by at least three months.

At a meeting held yesterday it was decided to postpone the pre-trial hearings until September 21, Anders Németh, the defence lawyer for one of the accused, told DR Nyheder.

The two police officers are both pleading not guilty.

Further information on the way
According to Németh, the decision to postpone has been made because last week the Tibet Commission was reconvened with a widened mandate to investigate all official Chinese visits since 1995.

“We’d like to know the Tibet Commission’s game-plan before we consider our position on the hearing,” said Németh.

“There is information on the way that has relevance for the case, so it doesn’t make sense to hold it at the present time,” added Németh.

Flags of (in)convenience
The two police officers have been charged with committing perjury in Copenhagen City Court when giving evidence in a case brought by a number of citizens who alleged that the police wrongfully arrested them during a legitimate demonstration. They also took away Tibetan flags so the Chinese visitors would not see them.

READ ALSO: Lawyer calls police testimony “untrue” in Tibet activist case

In court the officers said that no orders existed instructing them to remove Tibetan flags from demonstrators, but it was later revealed that such an order did exist. This led to the two policemen being censured in the Tibet Committee’s report, as well as the perjury charge.

According to Ekstra Bladet journalists who have seen the charge sheet, the prosecution intends to seek a custodial sentence. However, if the plaintiffs are given a sentence of less than six months, they would be able to serve it at home equipped with electronic tags.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”