242

News

Paternity leave issue further divides red bloc

Oliver Raassina
June 13th, 2018


This article is more than 6 years old.

A EU directive furthers illustrates the gap between the parties

Socialdemokratiet and the rest of the red bloc are once again in disagreement (photo: Sandra Skillingsås)

A new EU directive, expected to be implemented by most member states next week, has once again divided opinion among the red bloc.

The directive is set to give fathers two months paternity leave. It was initially set to give fathers four months before the two-month agreement was reached.

Yes to more paternity leave, no to Brussels
The Socialdemokratiet party took issue with this new directive, but only because it was decided by Brussels rather than the Danish Parliament.

“We don’t have anything against men taking longer paternity leave and we would like to work towards that,” the party’s EU spokesperson Peter Hummelgaard told DR Nyheder.

“But we are strongly against that it is coming by decree from Brussels.”

The party went as far as suggesting the directive undermines the Danish labour model.

Others support decision
The other members of the red bloc supported the directive, arguing it was a step in the right direction.

Trine Trop, the gender equality spokesman for SF, said: “It is good for children to have a good relationship with their father. It’s good for fathers that they are able to participate in their child’s life on equal terms as mothers.”

Socialdemokratiet drift further away
The reaction of the red bloc parties to the directive is just the latest in a series of issues that Socialdemokratiet disagreed on with the other members.

This includes Socialdemokratiet leader Mette Frederiksen announcing the party would not seek a coalition with Radikale and their differing opinions on the legalisation of cannabis.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”