92

News

HC Andersen’s childhood home in Denmark not a protected site

TheCopenhagenPost
May 14th, 2018


This article is more than 6 years old.

One of the country’s most iconic buildings is in fact just another house on the street

Perhaps a drive-thru? (photo: Elgaard)

HC Andersen’s childhood home in Odense does not enjoy protected status under heritage laws

Although the house has been maintained as a museum for many years, councillor Jane Jegind was shocked to discover that the home is not a heritage site.

“I was surprised,” she told Ekstra Bladet. “I first thought it might be a mistake and I had read it wrong.”

READ MORE: New Hans Christian Andersen museum green-lighted in Odense

Jegind said she was searching for the status of another building when she discovered that the Andersen home was not protected under the law. She double-checked several lists to confirm that the house was not covered.

Good spot for a KFC?
HC Andersen moved into the house with his parents as a two-year-old in 1807. He lived there for 12 years before moving to Copenhagen.

“It is not only a heritage site for Denmark, but for the whole world,” she said.

Jegind said that even though the building has been a museum for nearly 90 years, it is still important to give it legal protection.

“There are no challenges pending, but who’s to say what may happen in 20 or 50 years?”

What you don’t know …
The future protection of HC Andersen’s childhood home will be considered by the municipality City and Cultural Committee tomorrow.

Jegind said that she has no doubt that the committee will approve protecting the property, which it probably believed was already covered.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”