77

News

More to Danish social media than Facebook – just ask the influencers!

Ben Hamilton
May 9th, 2018


This article is more than 6 years old.

Whether it’s your son at school or your daughter at university, there’s a good chance most of their lifestyle decisions are based on advice from YouTubers or Instagrammers

It might be your inclination to switch Danish YouTuber Alexander Husum off, but almost 300,000 subscribers would beg to differ (photo: YouTube)

Denmark is not immune to YouTube and the lucrative potential of building advertising campaigns around influencers – the stars whose channels are watched by hundreds of thousands of children on the platform every week, and the bloggers and Instagrammers whose advice causes stampedes at the shopping centres.

Two-thirds of children aged 7 to 12 watch videos on YouTube every day, reports DR, while Kristine Sloth, one of the country’s most followed Instagrammers, can potentially hit 40 percent of all 18 to 24-year-old women with an average reach of 28 percent.

It’s no wonder that traditional advertising is dying out fast.

Influencers are more credible
DR has taken note, and this week it has unleashed a flurry of stories examining the phenomenon, which has become really big business for YouTube stars such as Alexander Husum, Rasmus Brohave, Morten Münster, Armin, Kristine Sloth and Julia Sofia.

“Influencers have a higher degree of credibility than traditional advertising,” Morten Saxnæs, the head of social & brand activation at Advertising Agency & Co, told DR.

“If a girl with a fashion blog recommends some clothes, she has a direct influence on what her followers are buying. We see the products sell out immediately after they have been recommended.”

A growing business
Increasingly YouTubers are employing marketing managers to maximise their potential, and over ten companies have been launched in the last five years to cater to the demand, such as Splay, Gonzo Media and Hippo, while long-established agencies such as Egmont and Aller are now entering the market.

Gonzo Media, which has doubled or tripled its revenue every year since launching in 2014, is expecting a turnover of 25-30 million kroner this year.

“We hit over one million unique viewers a month on our platforms, and the majority are between 10 and 25 years old,” chief executive Martin Wiinholt told DR.

“It’s a target audience that the old-fashioned media do not get in the same way.”

Happy to support the stars
Jan Trzaskowski, a professor of marketing law at Copenhagen Business School, questions whether “it is appropriate for companies to use young, inexperienced influencers to talk about their products”. And concerns have been expressed over the way the advertising is presented.

However, most adhere to the strict guidelines and make it clear when it is an advert.

“The viewers tend to know that someone is trying to sell them something, but they are just happy that the YouTubers are making money,” said Wiinholt.

“They do not lose respect by telling their viewers that the objective is to earn money. The target group understand that the influencers live from this, and most accept this as natural. There is only criticism if there is a bad match between the product and the influencer.”

Generational shift
“The youngsters today have a completely different relationship to advertising than their parents’ generation,” enthused Splay’s country manager Adrian Langer to DR.

And the generational shift is evident in the youngsters’ tastes, although parents shouldn’t be too alarmed, as the YouTubers are this generation’s rock stars, claims media researcher Stine Liv Johansen.

“Parents are inclined to wrinkle their nose, cross their arms and raise an eyebrow when they consider their children’s social media usage,” she told DR.

“But while it’s understandable parents are worried about the content of some of the videos, they shouldn’t start condemning their children’s fascination with the stars.”


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”