116

News

Danish Supreme Court precedent could increase housing associations’ eviction powers

Ben Hamilton
May 7th, 2018


This article is more than 6 years old.

The association has the upper hand now (photo: accurateserveftmyers.com)

A Supreme Court precedent could give the nation’s housing associations the right to evict tenants who commit crimes in the neighbourhoods in which they live.

Previously, the crime needed to be in the close vicinity of the criminal’s home for the eviction notice to stick.

The case in question concerned the family of a youth who attacked the police in the Vollsmose area of Bøgetorvet in the city of Odense, half a kilometre away from where they lived in Birkeparken.

A new tool in their armory
Pia Nielsen, the chief executive of FSB, which operates half the housing in the notorious north Copenhagen neighbourhood of Tingbjerg, expressed her pleasure with the ruling.

“The verdict says very clearly that you do not have to commit a crime on your doorstep, but in the general area, and it will be an important tool for us,” she told DR.

“It’s something we will use in special cases.”

Reversed High Court ruling
After losing the case at the Supreme Court, the youth’s mother must pay costs in excess of 70,000 kroner.

A High Court ruling had concluded she did not have to vacate the flat.

Her son was previously jailed for eight months for throwing stones, bottles and molotov cocktails at the police.

READ MORE: Son’s crime leads to family’s eviction

A political decision
The judgement would appear to be in line with the government’s recently-announced Ghetto Plan, which suggested that tenants could face eviction if they committed a crime within a kilometre of their home.

READ MORE: Politics News in Brief: Government aiming to get rid of ‘ghettos’ by 2030

The verdict could be appealed to the European Court of Human Rights, but lawyers are warning it would be a big risk and that the woman could jeopardise her fundamental rights to housing.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”