95

News

Government unveils new energy plan

Christian Wenande
April 26th, 2018


This article is more than 6 years old.

Billions of kroner in the mix to make Denmark fossil-free by 2050

Green, the colour of the future (photo: Pixabay)

Earlier this week, the government unfurled plans for Denmark to have one of the world’s biggest offshore energy parks. Now, a complete energy strategy has been revealed.

The strategy proposal (here in Danish) aims to ensure that at least half of Denmark’s energy needs are covered by sustainable energy by 2030 and make the country fossil fuel-free by 2050.

“The government’s long-term climate goals require Denmark to be a low-emission society by 2050,” said the energy and climate minister, Lars Christian Lilleholt.

“To get there we must cover at least half of Denmark’s energy needs with sustainable energy sources by 2030. With this energy proposal, the government is taking some important steps towards reaching our long-term goal climate goals.”

READ MORE: Government wants to build massive wind energy park

Expansion and modernisation
As part of the plan, the government will set aside 4.2 billion kroner to enhance competition between green technologies – meaning that wind turbines and solar power plants will compete with the likes of biomass to provide the Danes with as much green energy for their money as possible.

Aside from the wind energy park, other specific areas of the energy plan involve earmarking 4 billion kroner for the expansion of green biogas production, while 400 million kroner will be set aside every year from 2021-24 as an effort aimed at boosting energy savings in business.

From 2025, 500 million kroner will be set aside annually for new initiatives catering towards reaching the goal of Denmark being at least 50 percent energy sustainable by 2030.

The government also wants to modernise the heating sector and ease tariffs on electricity, while also better promoting the export of Danish energy technologies.

Not everyone is impressed, however.

The head of left-wing party Enhedslisten, Pernille Skipper, described the strategy as “embarrassingly unambitious”, contending it only pandered to giving tax breaks to large energy consumers.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”