90

News

Danish intelligence agency storing sensitive data in secret database

Christian Wenande
April 3rd, 2018


This article is more than 6 years old.

Politicians demand an explanation from the Justice Ministry over PET revelation

PET under the microscope (photo: Justice Ministry)

Politicians are up in arms following the revelation that the intelligence agency PET is storing sensitive personal data in a secret database.

According to Politiken newspaper, PET staff can view the information in the database – upon approval from PET heads – despite the law stipulating that PET must delete sensitive personal data 15 years (at the latest) after it is collected. PET called it a “logical deletion”.

“Calling it a logical deletion is pure George Orwell, because it’s neither logical nor a deletion. It’s the moving of data from one archive to another, which they then lock and give the PET head the keys to. The PET law’s deletion deadline has proven to be a postulate – we don’t have a system that protects the Danes’ judicial security,” Claus Juul, the head lawyer at Amnesty Denmark, told Politiken.

READ MORE: PET: Terror threat in Denmark still serious

Pape under the gun
According to the archive law from 2013, a large part of PET’s material must be transferred to the State Archives, so future historians can look at it. Meanwhile, some of it is kept at PET for security reasons.

A majority of the parties in Parliament, including Venstre, Socialdemokratiet, Dansk Folkeparti (DF), Alternativet, Radikale and Enhedslisten, have demanded an explanation from the justice minister, Søren Pape Poulsen.

“It goes without saying that we need to have a strong intelligence agency that can keep us all safe, but there should also be a fixed framework in place,” Peter Kofod Poulsen, DF’s spokesperson for judicial matters, told DR Nyheder.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”