113

News

Electronic scrap becoming a rapidly-growing global environmental problem

Stephen Gadd
March 18th, 2018


This article is more than 6 years old.

A lot of potential value is being lost because of the difficulty in recycling old electrical appliances

There’s lots of good stuff in here if only it could be got at (photo: Curtis Palmer)

When your mobile phone, computer or coffee machine dies, it is often impossible or uneconomical to repair, so the appliance has to be thrown out.

This is creating a huge environmental problem – often in developing countries that can least afford it.

“Over the last 50-100 years we’ve seen the invention and development of many different electronic devices, but the technology to ensure that their components can be recycled has not kept pace,” Keshav Parajuly, a postDoc at the University of Southern Denmark’s (SDU) life-cycle centre, told Ny Viden.

READ ALSO: Millions in discarded electrical goods – Danes throw out the baby with the bathwater

Electronic scrap is estimated to be the fastest-growing sector within the rubbish stream and, according to Parajuly, it is growing globally by 50 million tonens every year.

From rich to poor
A lot of electronic scrap is exported from rich to poor countries that don’t have a proper framework in place to dispose of it in an environmentally-friendly way.

For example, computer components are often burnt over open fires to extract saleable metals. The vapours caused by this process can be poisonous, and there is also a risk of permanent contamination due to dangerous chemicals such as lead and arsenic leeching out from rubbish dumps.

The most environmentally-beneficial way of dealing with these products is the circular economy, suggests Parajuly. Following this model, the products or materials are reclaimed, reused and keep their value as much as possible.

The challenge is to develop business models to satisfy both producers and companies in the recycling field.

Enter the E-circle
“Today, the system is fragmented. The parties don’t communicate with each other and have no incentive to get out of the ‘buy and throw away’ culture. That’s why a lot of – also valuable – resources are lost, such as rare metals,” said Parajuly.

The SDU life-cycle centre has been involved in a project in which researchers from different areas work together to develop a platform to support the circular economy within electronics called E-circle.

The idea is that all the interested parties will be able to obtain help and inspiration about recycling and reusing electronic devices.

“For instance, we’d like manufacturers to put their drawings and data about the materials that their products are made of on the platform. That would be useful to companies that buy up discarded electrical goods to take them apart for recycling. They would know what materials were valuable,” explained Parajuly.

The platform will also enable designers and manufacturers to benefit from advice on how they could change their designs to make them more recyclable when they no longer work.

Different strategies
Parajuly also points out that with over 1,000 different electrical items, different strategies are required for each product to ensure optimal recyclability.

“A car is a large investment that you don’t just throw away because some of the parts don’t work. You get it repaired and even if it it has to be scrapped it is still valuable because a lot of the parts can be reused,” he said.

“A hair-dryer is completely different. If it can’t be repaired, the economic and environmental costs might be higher trying to recycle it than burning it. Here, the best strategy would be to design it so that it lasts 20 years and then sell it at a higher price.”


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”