70

News

New rules on preserving email correspondence in public bodies needed, say politicians

Stephen Gadd
March 13th, 2018


This article is more than 6 years old.

The recent public enquiry into the events surrounding the visits of the Chinese head of state and the suppression of anti-Tibet demonstrators have highlighted a serious loophole in the system

The Ministry of Chinese – sorry, Foreign – Affairs is under fire from the Tibet Commission (photo: Medill DC)

Just before Christmas last year, after two years’ work at a cost of 23.3 million kroner, the Tibet Commission finally delivered its report on the events surrounding the visits to Denmark of China’s head of state in 2012 and 2013.

The commission was set up to investigate who was responsible for pro-Tibet demonstrators being moved on, detained and having their banners and posters confiscated by the police in contravention of their constitutional right to demonstrate peacefully.

READ ALSO: Danish police were under orders to make sure Chinese president didn’t “lose face”

When the report was published, the commission was more or less forced to conclude that two middle-ranking police chiefs were solely responsible for issuing the illegal orders.

Off the hook
But officers higher up the chain of command escaped criticism because their email accounts had been deleted before the enquiry started and were therefore unavailable to the commission, DR Nyheder reports.

A majority in parliament now wants to devise a set of rules governing how long public bodies should be obliged to keep emails.

“It is totally absurd that these important emails in particular have not been part of the commission’s remit. It seems futile that the enquiry has been going on so long when they have not had access to them,” said Josephine Fock, a spokesperson for Alternativet.

No backup
According to Rigspolitiet, the system only keeps deleted emails for a period of 30 days. After this there is no backup, either of mails that employees have deleted themselves or of the email accounts of the police chiefs who are no longer working there.

The justice minister, Søren Pape Poulsen, has promised to look into the matter and the police have also indicated they will examine their internal rules for keeping deleted emails and see whether there is a need to extend it longer than 30 days.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”