111

News

Par for the course? Dismissed executive gets six-figure payout

Douglas Whitbread
March 8th, 2018


This article is more than 6 years old.

Legal case could set a precedent for those on flexi-time contracts

Time for a round during work? (photo: GingerQuip)

Does your boss allow you to get in a round of golf during your office hours? A recent ruling on labour conditions in Denmark could ensure this is now firmly within your rights.

Courts ordered the insurance company ETU Forsikring to compensate a worker who was dismissed due to the way he allotted his time whilst employed on a flexible hours contract.

Ulrich Busch was sacked in August 2016 after management at his office used surveillance equipment to discover that he regularly spent his mornings playing golf at a local club.

However, judge Sofie Christensen agreed with the prosecution that the dismissal was unjustified as not only did Busch take phone calls whilst on the course, he also reconciled any missed hours by working evenings.

“As there was no agreement or expressed expectation on the conditions of Ulrich Busch’s working time or a necessity for him to be present at the office, there is no substantial neglect of his work through his activities on the golf course,” she said in her ruling.

A landmark decision?
The case was brought by Busch’s union, Frie Funktionærer. The head of the organisation’s legal team, Claus Christensen, suggests the ruling is a warning to other employers who might try to dismiss staff on similar grounds.

“This judgement shows that a person cannot be ignored because, for example, they go to the golf course during the day whilst still fulfilling obligations stated within their employment contract,” Christensen told DR.

“It’s a principle decision that shows all employees who have flexible working hours possess a high degree of freedom to organise their working day without the risk that they might lose their jobs.”

Busch originally asked for 640,718 kroner as compensation for his loss of earnings and being the subject of illegal surveillance activities. However, the court’s final decision meant the employer was sentenced to pay 386,000 kroner along with the prosecution’s legal costs.

READ MORE: Copenhagen agrees to flexible work hours for public workers


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”