121

News

Horsens launches project to track tourists via their WiFi usage

Stephen Gadd
March 5th, 2018


This article is more than 6 years old.

A number of Danish towns are anxious to obtain more information on how visitors behave when visiting

The municipality wants big data on tourists but there are ‘Big Brother’ concerns (photo: Hubertus45)

If you are a tourist in a strange town, where do you go, what shops and restaurants do you visit and what local sights do you head for?

The chamber of commerce and tourist organisation in Horsens in Jutland has just launched a project to collect data on just these things, reports Version2.dk.

Since March 2, there have been 28 sensors in the city centre collecting and registering WiFi signals and with them, the media access control (MAC) address of mobile phones from passers-by up to 20 metres away.

Separating the sheep from the goats
“At the moment we don’t know much about the tourists that visit Horsens for a day or two. We’d like to have better data to understand how they move around the town,” said Helle Berthold Rosenberg, head of tourism in Kystlandet.

The data collected will be put through a hash algorithm that generates a value that can’t be traced back to the original MAC address, so it will not be possible to identify individuals.

The hash value will remain the same for 30 days so that tourists can be separated from local residents though their movement patterns.

The inspiration for the project came from ‘Visit Djursland’ that has been collecting the same type of data from 26 sensors since 2017. According to Tourism.nu, from July 2017 up to October 22 the same year, 10 million readings were collected from 200,000 individual guests.

Privacy concerns
However, a number of people have used the Facebook page of the local newspaper, Horsens Folkeblad, to register concerns about privacy.

Among other things, Jens Posselt asked: “What guarantee do we have that the information is made anonymous? Who is checking the people collecting it? What business is it really of the shopkeepers in Horsens how people move around?”

And Ona Ina added that “Looks as if there could be a problem with this Big Brother data surveillance.”

But Kystland’s head of tourism does not see a problem. “It’s important to emphasise that we can’t see who is moving around where. All the data is anonymous and used for compiling statistics showing movent,” she added.

“Personally, I’m more worried about the data collection that Google and Facebook engage in.”


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”