82

News

Danes: Media were unfair to Prince Henrik

Christian Wenande
February 27th, 2018


This article is more than 6 years old.

The Ekstra Bladet tabloid was particularly harsh in its coverage

Prince Henrik: 1934-2018 (photo: P: Steen Brogaard, Kongehuset)

The Danish media were eager to laud Prince Henrik and his life in the days following his death on February 13. Front covers after cover, and article after article, newspapers and magazines praised the French-born royal for his gallant representation of Denmark over the decades.

But as thousands of Danes lined up across Copenhagen to bid their final farewell to the prince, they would not be bamboozled so easily. Not this time.

For they remembered the ridicule, and at times outright disdain, that the media had heaped upon the poor Frenchman – the worst offenders being tabloids and gossip rags like Ekstra Bladet and Se og Hør.

A new Magafon survey compiled on behalf of TV2 and Politken shows that 58 percent of Danes didn’t think the Danish media gave Prince Henrik a fair shake during his time in Denmark. And only 23 percent felt that the media treatment of the prince was acceptable.

READ MORE: Queen Margrethe and Royal Family bid farewell to Prince Henrik

Ekstra Bladet Effekten
The tabloid Ekstra Bladet seems to bears much of the blame. With nicknames like ‘King Truancy’ and ‘Prince Beer Gut’, not much was off-limits – particularly in his later years when he began behaving more erratically ahead of being diagnosed with dementia.

“We’ve had media that have been very brutal in their treatment of Prince Henrik,” the culture minister, Mette Bock, told TV2.

“I think we need to be honest and admit that they haven’t always treated the prince fairly and with understanding.”


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”