335

News

20-year-old receives 30-day suspended sentence for sharing sex video

Douglas Whitbread
February 6th, 2018


This article is more than 6 years old.

The sentence is one of nine test trials this week

Just a few swipes and clicks away from facing criminal charges (photo: pxhere)

A 20-year-old man was given a 30-day suspended prison sentence at a Randers court yesterday for sharing a widely-viewed video on Facebook featuring under-18s involved in sexual activity.

The case is the first of nine being tried over the next week that will help set a precedent for a crime that 1,000 young people in Denmark have been charged with.

As a result of the conviction, it is believed the man will have a criminal record for at least two years and also spend at least ten years on the child offence registry – which will bar them from working in jobs relating to children.

READ MORE: Over a thousand Danish youths charged for sharing sex video

 

Court ruling
The prosecution had sought a 60-day prison sentence on the basis that the man had shared pornographic material involving a minor (under-18s), but the court acknowledged his young age and co-operation. The accused man had asked for the complete dismissal of the case.

The court awarded 10,000 kroner in compensation to a 15-year-old girl seen in the video, but nothing to a similarly-aged boy involved.

National discussion
All of the charges in the nine cases stem from the sharing of several sex videos on social media, between 2015 and 2017, which has generated a vibrant public discussion in Denmark.

Some have argued that the defendants are too young to be countable for the charges and that the wide dissemination of the material means blame cannot rest with any specific individual.

Others have argued that the defendants’ actions must be viewed as a severe crime, which demands public prosecution and a prison sentence. They contend that the charge of sharing child pornography, whether on social media or other public platforms, requires punitive action to prevent events such as this occurring in the future.

An ongoing process
The second of nine test trials will take place today. The complexity of the case means that each test trial deals with a case that differs slightly in the context of the defendants’ actions.

The overall result will be a set of legal parameters that will define the limits of the actions brought against future defendants charged with a similar offence.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”