65

News

Capital region up in arms over municipal countervailing scheme

Christian Wenande
February 2nd, 2018


This article is more than 6 years old.

Dozens of municipalities complain that too much money is going to Jutland

The appeal to Parliament (photo: Albertslund Kommune)

Should you have picked up Berlingske or Politiken newspapers this morning, you might have come across an interesting full-page ad.

The ad was paid for by 34 municipalities from the Capital Region that feel the so-called ‘udligningsordningen’ (‘countervailing scheme’) – which aims to reduce the economic differences between Danish municipalities – has gone too far.

“Over the past many years, Parliament has moved more and more money from the capital area to Jutland. The amount has doubled since 2007 and has reached 13.3 billion kroner in 2018 … Stop this differential treatment now,” the ad read.

READ MORE: DR willing to replace media licence with a tax

Simpler by 2019
The ad also referred to a press release released by Frederikshavn on January 19 in a bid to attract state workers to the Jutland municipality. It highlighted that families would have more money at their disposal after the usual expenses were paid compared to Lyngby-Taarbæk Municipality in the Capital Region.

The municipalities in the Capital Region don’t want to scrap udligningsordningen, they just want to make it fairer.

“We’ve had enough. From 2017 to 2018 alone, udligningsordningen increased by 1.5 billion kroner and we are in a situation in which the municipalities in Jutland want even more. We simply don’t think that this is reasonable,” Steen Christiansen, the mayor of Albertslund, told DR Nyheder.

The economy and internal affairs minister, Simon Emil Ammitzbøll-Bille, is currently looking into the contentious scheme and he has indicated that he intends to make it more simple. An agreement could be ready by the start of next year.

The 34 municipalities behind the appeal to Parliament are Albertslund, Allerød, Ballerup, Brøndby, Dragør, Egedal, Fredensborg, Frederiksberg, Frederikssund, Furesø, Gentofte, Gladsaxe, Glostrup, Greve, Gribskov, Halsnæs, Helsingør, Herlev, Hillerød, Hvidovre, Høje-Taastrup, Hørsholm, Ishøj, København, Køge, Lejre, Lyngby-Taarbæk, Roskilde, Rudersdal, Rødovre, Solrød, Stevns, Tårnby and Vallensbæk.

See the ad below in Politiken

(photo: Christian Wenande)


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”