200

News

Danish research: Women are the strongest gender

Christian Wenande
January 10th, 2018


This article is more than 6 years old.

Men may have more muscle, but women have the kids and live longer

Sorry lads, you are the weakest link (photo: Pixabay)

Finally, there is scientific evidence confirming what all women knew all along: they are the strongest gender!

And it’s Danish researchers from the Max Planck Odense Center and the University of Southern Denmark who have laid waste to the battle of the sexes by investigating historical life expectancy data.

They discovered that women had longer life expectancies than men during catastrophes – such as during the Great Famine of Ireland from 1845-1849.

“We studied male–female survival differences in populations of slaves and populations exposed to severe famines and epidemics. We find that even when mortality was very high, women lived longer on average than men,” the research found.

“Most of the female advantage was due to differences in mortality among infants: baby girls were able to survive harsh conditions better than baby boys. These results support the view that the female survival advantage is modulated by a complex interaction of biological environmental and social factors.”

READ MORE: Denmark among top EU nations for gender equality

Slavery the exception
Before the hunger crisis, both sexes had an average life expectancy of around 38 years, but during the famine that figure tumbled to 18.17 for men, while it only dropped to 22.4 for women.

The very same trend was replicated during other crises and famines in other countries, suggesting that women are biologically superior to men when it comes to surviving life-threatening events such as famine and disease epidemics.

As part of their findings, the researchers discovered that the only place where more men survived than women was in the slave trade in Trinidad. The researchers believe this was because male slaves had a higher value and therefore more effort was put into keeping them alive.

The study has been published in the scientific journal, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”