110

News

Maersk dragging its feet over radioactive waste

Stephen Gadd
November 16th, 2017


This article is more than 7 years old.

The storage of nuclear waste from Maersk’s drilling operations in the North Sea is proving a headache for the company

Even low-level waste can pose a storage problem (photo: University of Manchester)

According to Maersk Oil, restructuring within the company has been the cause of it having taken 18 months to respond to a number of demands from the authorities regarding 450 tonnes of low-level nuclear waste stored in Esbjerg.

READ ALSO: Risø to continue as Denmark’s nuclear waste storage facility

Back in July 5 last year, the Danish health authority, Sundhedsstyrelsen, contacted Maersk regarding the waste because it was felt that it was not being stored safely, reports DR Nyheder.

Deadline after deadline
The company was supposed to comply with a number of the authority’s demands by 1 September 2016, but missed at least four of the deadlines. It was then given until 1 November 2016 to comply, but failed to do so, resulting in another postponement until March 17 this year.

However, on March 20, the authority noted that it “had not heard anything” from Maersk and the company later confirmed by telephone that it had not sent off the required documents. Another deadline was then set for March 24 – which also passed.

This resulted in a communication from the authority reading: “SIS draws the attention of Maersk Oil and Gas to the fact that non-compliance with the demands from Sundhedsstyrelsen could result in a fine.”

A new look at the procedures
This evidently had some effect because on May 8 the authority confirmed that it had received the major part of the required paperwork. However, there were still a few things outstanding and Maersk was requested to send this by May 18 at the latest.

Maersk has finally complied with nearly all the demands, but together with the company the authorities have decided to carry out an analysis of their radioactive waste that will only be finished in 2019.

The company insists it is acting within the law and it is co-operating fully with the authorities.

“We are in regular dialogue with the authorities on this issue and we have implemented a number of measures to improve the handling of our stockpile of low-level waste,” the company said in a written statement.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”